Alt.gothic Alcohol Transfer Engine: Difference between revisions

From altgothic
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New page: == _alt.gothic Alcohol Transfer Engine [agATE]_ RFC== == As devised by erith, Scientific Factologist, and Specifistician == == Description == agATE is a simple pr...
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
know goth(c)<ref> e.g. Charlotte Octal </ref><ref> Look, i'm doing my best here. it is about process, not names.</ref> will be seeing goth(a) and then goth(b) soon.
know goth(c)<ref> e.g. Charlotte Octal </ref><ref> Look, i'm doing my best here. it is about process, not names.</ref> will be seeing goth(a) and then goth(b) soon.


So, goth(a) acquires a stone<ref>No, really - some kind of rock or a marble or something, a physical token. [[alt.gothic Libatory Encounter Token | an agLET]] ([[alt.gothic Libatory Encounter Token]]) is an acceptable substitute. I might even make some for distribution...</ref>, buys goth(c) a drink, and sends goth(b) the
So, goth(a) acquires a stone<ref>No, really - some kind of rock or a marble or something, a physical token. [[AgLET | an agLET]] ([[AgLET | alt.gothic Libatory Encounter Token]]) is an acceptable substitute. I might even make some for distribution...</ref>, buys goth(c) a drink, and sends goth(b) the
stone. When goth(b) sees goth(c) they give goth(c) the stone, and goth(c)
stone. When goth(b) sees goth(c) they give goth(c) the stone, and goth(c)
buys goth(b) a drink. For validation purposes, goth(a) has supplied goth(c)
buys goth(b) a drink. For validation purposes, goth(a) has supplied goth(c)
Line 22: Line 22:


{|  
{|  
| A wishes to buy B a drink. || A -intent->  B
| A wishes to buy B a drink. || A --intent-->  B
|-
|-
| A is able to buy C a drink. || A  -means-->  C
| A is able to buy C a drink. || A  -means-->  C
Line 30: Line 30:
|A sends a token to B. || A  -agLET-->  B
|A sends a token to B. || A  -agLET-->  B
|-
|-
|A buys a drink for C. || A  -*pint*->  C
|A buys a drink for C. || A  --*pint*--->  C
|-
|-
|B gives token to C.  || B  -agLET-->  C
|B gives token to C.  || B  -agLET-->  C
|-
|-
|C buys a drink for B.  || C  -*pint*->  B
|C buys a drink for B.  || C  --*pint*--->  B
|-
|-
|Through process then, || A  -*pint*->  B
|Through process then, || A  --*pint*--->  B
|-
|-
| || A  -agLET-->  C</nowiki>
| || A  -agLET-->  C
| Happiness abounds. ||
|-
| || Happiness abounds.  
|}
|}



Latest revision as of 02:12, 21 May 2008

_alt.gothic Alcohol Transfer Engine [agATE]_ RFC

Description

agATE is a simple process. Let us suppose that Alice and Bob have a shared secret. No, wait. Erm. goth(a)[1] wishes to buy goth(b)[2] a drink. goth(a) and goth(b) are unlikely to be at the same event in the near future, but both know goth(c)[3][4] will be seeing goth(a) and then goth(b) soon.

So, goth(a) acquires a stone[5], buys goth(c) a drink, and sends goth(b) the stone. When goth(b) sees goth(c) they give goth(c) the stone, and goth(c) buys goth(b) a drink. For validation purposes, goth(a) has supplied goth(c) with a picture of the stone, if not a counterpart.[6] goth(a) has, for all intents and purposes, purchased a drink for goth(b), and goth(c) not only has a story from it, but a token of their participation in the transaction.

Process

To recap -

A wishes to buy B a drink. A --intent--> B
A is able to buy C a drink. A -means--> C
C is (or will be) able to buy B a drink. C -means--> B
A sends a token to B. A -agLET--> B
A buys a drink for C. A --*pint*---> C
B gives token to C. B -agLET--> C
C buys a drink for B. C --*pint*---> B
Through process then, A --*pint*---> B
A -agLET--> C
Happiness abounds.

agLET Conceptualization

Frequent travellers within the gothic subculture may find themselves laden with agLETs. Ensuring that they have a means to be transported, personalising them, or otherwise ensuring that goth(C) has an interest in displaying said token/agLET just makes the scheme better.

A draft agLET speculation follows:

an agLET (alt.gothic Libatory Encounter Token) should be:

  1. unique
  2. such that it can be sent in a standard airmail envelope
  3. recognisable from a digital photograph/description/similar

the following qualities of an agLET are preferred:

  1. made out of rock
  2. capable of being attached to a cord, keychain, or lanyard
  3. shiny

improvements to the agLET specification may include:

  1. recyclability
  2. inherent addressability (as with Gothic Internal Mail Protocol)
  3. sustainability
  4. jangly

Footnotes

  1. e.g. Absinthe Fabricat Cardiac
  2. e.g. Bier Of Sorrows
  3. e.g. Charlotte Octal
  4. Look, i'm doing my best here. it is about process, not names.
  5. No, really - some kind of rock or a marble or something, a physical token. an agLET ( alt.gothic Libatory Encounter Token) is an acceptable substitute. I might even make some for distribution...
  6. agLET's may, for example, be a key and a lock. this is not just about working, but about being exclusionary and elitist. think of these as our very own round TUITs.